On June 22, 2006, Athletic Director Cary Groth received an email containing a statement that I was aware of NCAA rule violations in the Nevada men’s basketball program.
Here are excerpts from her deposition regarding that email:
Athletic Director Groth’s Deposition #1:
Q: And on the second page it says, "Coach Patraw said she also had knowledge of a basketball coach violating NCAA rules and believes he is also afraid of her disclosing the violations to the University." Is that the part that you were referring to?
GROTH: Yes.
Q: Did you take it to [the Director of Compliance]?
GROTH: I didn’t.
....
GROTH: Our faculty athletics rep at the time was Chris Exline, and I showed him this letter...
Q: Do you know if he did anything at all with –
GROTH: No. I don’t know if he had a conversation with Terri or not.
Q: Okay. What did you do about it?
....
GROTH: ... had a conversation with our faculty rep, and I don’t know what he did about it.
Q: Who is the faculty rep?
GROTH: It’s Dr. Exline, Chris Exline.
Groth’s testimony is nothing but a physical impossibility. Dr. Chris Exline, a wonderful man, passed away on April 11, 2006, two months before the existence of the June 22, 2006 email alleging the NCAA violations.
Groth did not "show him this letter" nor did she "have a conversation with him" about it.
Not only did Groth lie, she placed blame for the lack of investigation into the allegations on an innocent man who is no longer with us to defend himself. Her lies exposed her cover up of NCAA violations in the Nevada Athletic Department.
The faculty rep at the time was Dr. Jean Perry. Perry testified that Groth did not report the allegations to her.
Any more questions on this Athletic Director's integrity, or rather lack thereof?
- Excerpts from the transcript of the hearing on corruption at the University of Nevada, Reno.
Chuck Wynne, of the NCAA, said . . . "We’re all about student-athlete well-being" . . .
At the University of Nevada, Reno, however, the administration attempts to "use" student-athletes to cover up their corruption.
Then interim Coach Antoinette Marjanovic conspired with Executive Associate Athletic Director Cindy Fox to solicit manufactured evidence from student-athletes:
I [student-athlete’s name redacted] was contacted by an athletic department employee, Antoinette Marjanovic. She asked me if I would send in a written complaint about Terri. Marjanovic said that Cindy Fox stopped in her office and said if you can get the student athletes to write complaints that Terri’s presence makes them uncomfortable we can use those statements to get her banned from campus.
So much for student-athlete well being . . .
Of course, true to form, Nevada Athletic Director Cary Groth committed more perjury . . . pertaining to her own cover-up of NCAA violations in the Nevada Men's Basketball Program.
Athletic Director Cary Groth's Under Oath Lie:
ATTORNEY KENT ROBISON: .... did you become aware later that [Terri] accepted money in exchange for not reporting [Assistant Basketball Coach] to the NCAA?
CARY GROTH: I did.
ROBISON: Is that violative of her role as a coach at the University of Nevada, Reno?
GROTH: It is her responsibility to inform us of any potential NCAA violations, yes, sir.
Groth and Robison know that I have NEVER accepted any money from the Assistant Basketball Coach in exchange for not reporting NCAA violations. I have absolute proof of this. In addition, the Assistant Basketball Coach has also stated that this is a false statement [lie] by Groth.
So why would Groth lie about this? Because she covered up NCAA violations in the basketball program and subsequently violated her role as Nevada's Athletic Director.
The following is an example of witness tampering by University of Nevada, Reno Athletic Director Cary Groth, Executive Associate Athletic Director Cindy Fox, and Head Golf Coach Rich Merritt.
Q: "Did Cary Groth ever call you and encourage you to stay out of this lawsuit?"
WITNESS: "Yes, she did."
Q: "Did Cindy Fox?"
WITNESS: "Yes, she did."
Q: "Did Rich Merritt?"
WITNESS: "Yes, he did."
The witness then testified about what AD Cary Groth said to her:
WITNESS: "You are going to want to stay quiet. Keep your mouth shut. Stay quiet, you know, stay out of this because it's going to involve attorneys and to protect your family you don't want to be involved."
Q: "Did anybody ever say to you that Terri wasn't your friend?"
WITNESS: "Yes, Associate AD Cindy Fox. She called my house . . . I pretty much kind of questioned her because Terri and Cindy were so close."
"Cindy said the same thing that Cary said, 'Stay out of it, you know, protect your family. Protect those boys . . . remain quiet. Don't talk to Terri,' those types of things."
Q: "Similar to what Cary Groth said to you?"
WITNESS: "Yes."
Q: "Was Cindy Fox still your supervisor at the time?"
WITNESS: "Yes."
This is one of many, many, many examples of perjury by Athletic Director Cary Groth:
• General Counsel Mary Dugan:
- "Patraw refused the contract offer made to her by AD Groth on August 22, 2007"
• VP Human Resources:
- "It is clear to me Groth had offered Patraw a contract"
• Associate Athletic Director:
- "Groth did mention that there had been a new contract offer to Patraw"
• Vice-Provost Janet Vreeland
- "Well, they made Patraw an offer. I was told she rejected it"
•
- "I spoke to Groth . . . She stated she offered you a contract and you turned it down"
Groth's testimony under oath in a deposition:
QUESTION: Had the August 2007 contract been extended to Patraw?
GROTH: No
Liar! Groth knew that terminating someone a few days after offering them a multi-year contract and raise is irrational and retaliatory. She lied under oath to conceal her retaliation.
- Excerpts from the transcript of the hearing on corruption at the University of Nevada, Reno.
Athletic Director Cary Groth was made aware (via an email) on June 22nd, 2006 that I had knowledge of NCAA violations in the men's basketball program.
This is Cary Groth's testimony regarding that email:
Groth read that e-mail and she acknowledges that in her deposition.
Groth concedes she did not take the allegations of violations in the email to her Director of Compliance.
Groth also says she did not tell Jean Perry about it because "Jean Perry wasn't hired at the time" (June 22, 2006). Perry oversees the compliance office in the Nevada Athletic Department.
Athletic Director Groth testified under oath that "Jean Perry wasn't hired at the time" (June 22, 2006). If you go back one page to 1829, it proves that Jean Perry was hired five months earlier.
Jean Perry began working in the athletic department on January 1st, 2006.
So that was another lie by Groth in her coverup of NCAA violations.
The overwhelming evidence of whistleblower retaliation in my case, including direct admissions of retaliation by Athletic Director Cary Groth and the university lawyers, led the defendants to engage in criminal activity in their efforts to defeat my claims.
The testimony below sheds light on another lie by Groth while she was attempting to manufacture evidence against me.
______________________
ATHLETIC DIRECTOR GROTH TESTIFIED:
Q Was - - now . . . was any opportunity given to Terri to talk to NAME REDACTED?
GROTH: No. I made that decision. She asked. I told her I’d set it up, but after discussing it with other people, and trying to determine what the benefit of that meeting would be, I decided not to, and NAME REDACTED, at the same time, didn’t want - - to have a conversation with her.
NAME REDACTED TESTIFIED:
Q Do you know if Terri was trying to get a meeting with you about this matter?
NR: Me?
Q Yes.
NR: Not to my knowledge.
Q Ms. Groth never told you that?
NR: No.
______________________
In her desperation to manufacture evidence, Athletic Director Groth is caught lying once again.
- Perjury
- Submission of false personnel files
- Falsification of public documents
- Illegal subpoena
- Falsification of legal documents
- Manufactured false evidence
- Solicitation of student-athletes to manufacture evidence
- Threats to witnesses and their families
- Witness tampering and witness harassment
- Embezzlement
- Perjured Affidavits
- Abuse of Power
- Harassment
- False and Defamatory statements in the media
How does University of Nevada, Reno Athletic Director Cary Groth falsify evidence?
Here is an email from a former UNR employee to Groth:
Can you remind me again what that email I need to say to you needs to have in it?
Forty-three (43) minutes later, at the direction of Groth, an email arrives from this former employee with Groth's manufactured evidence.
* * *
Did you know it is a felony to falsify evidence? Yes, Cary Groth committed yet another felony on the job. Groth engaged in this illegal activity through her UNR email account.
Why did this former employee take part in this criminal activity? Because he too was guilty of misconduct (violating NCAA rules) on the job and therefore conspired with Groth to cover it up.
Athletic Director Cary Groth to me: "You are a great, great coach. Nobody can deny that. I just need to move on. I looked in your personnel file. There was nothing to use against you."
I responded, "This has whistleblower lawsuit written all over it."
Groth replied, "I know."
I guess it is pretty clear why the university lawyers had to falsify my personnel files. My annual
"commendable" personnel evaluations were problematic for them.

University of Nevada Athletic Director Cary Groth retained Golf Coach Rich Merritt with full knowledge that he repeatedly lied and mislead the administration.
President Glick retained AD Groth with full knowledge that she has lied to donors, judges, students, employees, colleagues, the community, and "others" in her position as A.D.
Glick also knows that AD Groth committed perjury on numerous occasions and falsified documents to cover up her own misconduct.
Glick rewarded his corrupt Athletic Director with a 3-year contract extension.
The NCAA is the governing body that sets the rules and standards of conduct that Groth and Glick are supposed to adhere to as representatives of UNR.
See this quote from an NCAA major infractions case involving another university:
This was a serious infractions case, which included academic fraud and the provision of false and misleading information, violations the NCAA Committee on Infractions considers to be egregious.